We support the next generation Fintech companies

FintechCounsel

We can help Fintech and other financial services business with access to the EU market. We specialise in (regulatory) market access projects such as licensing projects, legal interim and advisory jobs and we help our customers navigate the complex financial regulatory landscape in the EU. We supported the next generation Fintech companies in realising their vision of seamless and integrated financial services for their customers. Don’t hesitate to contact me today if you face similar challenges.

Let's talk!

Photo: Evelien Woldman

How can we help you?

Advisory & Bespoke

Tailored financial regulatory advice from an EU and NL perspective to navigate the complex and evolving regulatory landscape. We can also help out with tailor-made services, such as board training for regulatory Fit & Proper Assessments

Complex Projects

Get support your complex projects, such as cross-border regulatory compliance projects, legal and compliance product development or license applications (for PSPs, EMIs, etc.)

Interim Support

Get interim support at times of transition, rapid scaling or other crunch times. We are flexible and can help alleviate pressure on your team at short notice!

View All Services

Blog

Levelling Up: From Reactive to Strategic Compliance in FinTech

29 July 2025

Why every fintech leader needs to think strategically about compliance—before it becomes a business-critical problem

There’s a moment in every growing fintech’s journey when compliance stops being “something we’ll figure out later” and becomes the make-or-break factor for sustainable growth. The companies that recognize this inflection point early become industry leaders. Those that don’t often find themselves scrambling to rebuild their entire compliance infrastructure while burning through cash and losing critical talent.

The Hidden Cost of Compliance Technical Debt

Just like software teams accumulate technical debt through quick fixes, fintech companies accumulate compliance technical debt through reactive, piecemeal approaches to regulatory requirements. This debt compounds over time, eventually demanding a reckoning.

What it looks like:

Separate compliance processes for each jurisdiction that don’t integrate
Regulatory silos treating each requirement as an isolated project
Point solutions that trap data and create manual reconciliation processes

The compounding problem: Every new market entry becomes exponentially more complex. Every product launch requires navigating an increasingly tangled web of requirements. Eventually, this debt makes companies less agile, more expensive, and significantly riskier.

Warning Signs: When Reactive Compliance Becomes Business-Critical

Operational red flags:

Licensing delays (12-18 months instead of 6-9 months for new markets)
Consistent audit findings across jurisdictions indicating systemic problems
Compliance consuming increasing senior management time and engineering resources

People problems:

Experienced compliance professionals leaving due to constant firefighting
Difficulty hiring top talent who can see the technical debt during interviews
Team burnout from manual processes and emergency fixes

Business impact:

Product launches consistently delayed due to compliance readiness
Compliance costs growing faster than revenue
Investor and board concerns about regulatory risk management

The Strategic Transformation: Three Pillars of Modern Compliance

Recent regulatory guidance reinforces the urgency. The EBA found that 70% of authorities report high ML/TF risks in fintech due to weak controls and poor governance, with firms prioritizing growth over compliance. Over half of serious compliance failures involved improper RegTech use.

1. Integrated Risk Architecture

Take a topical approach across your key markets. Instead of building separate “Dutch compliance,” “EU compliance,” and “third-country compliance” systems, organize around functional areas such as data privacy, AML/CFT and Sanctions and Operational Resilience.

This means identifying common regulatory themes across jurisdictions, building to the highest standard as your baseline, then layering on local variations through configuration rather than separate systems.

2. Forward-Looking Design

Start with where you want to be, not where you are. Systematic regulatory horizon scanning 18-24 months ahead, scenario planning for multiple regulatory futures, and scalable infrastructure that grows with the business.

3. Optimized Resource Deployment

Cost-conscious investment in proven RegTech solutions that work across jurisdictions, combined with deep human expertise. Technology enhances human judgment—it doesn’t replace it. As the Dutch Central Bank emphasizes: “money is about trust,” and improper tech implementation breaks that trust.

The Leadership Imperative

Strategic compliance transformation requires committed executive sponsorship and board-level support. The approach varies by company, but fundamentals remain constant:

Honest assessment of current state and clear target-state articulation
Global team alignment on methodologies, standards, and decision-making authority
Rigorous enforcement that makes adherence to the new approach non-negotiable

Success should be measured by business outcomes—time-to-market improvements, cost efficiency, risk prevention—not traditional compliance activity metrics.

The Competitive Advantage

Companies that get strategic compliance right don’t just avoid problems—they create advantages:

Market Access Speed: Faster entry into new markets creates first-mover advantages
Investor Confidence: Mature compliance capabilities reduce perceived risk and improve valuations
Talent Attraction: Top professionals want to work for strategically-minded companies
Regulatory Relationships: Strong relationships create goodwill during challenging situations

Your Next Move

The fintech regulatory landscape grows more complex every quarter—DORA, MiCA, evolving data protection, operational resilience mandates. Companies approaching these challenges strategically will thrive. Those continuing with reactive approaches will find themselves increasingly constrained.

The question isn’t whether regulatory complexity will increase—it’s whether you’ll be prepared. The earlier you transition from reactive to strategic compliance, the more options you’ll have and the less it will cost.

The best time to build strategic compliance capabilities was when you started your company. The second-best time is today.

EBA’s 2025 ML/TF opinion: A wake-up call for FinTech compliance

The European Banking Authority has published a clear assessment of money laundering and terrorist financing (ML/TF) risks in its latest report (EBA/Op/2025/10). For FinTech companies, including EMIs and Payment Institutions operating in the Netherlands and across the EU, this Opinion provides both a reality check and a guide for improving compliance systems.

The FinTech challenge: Growth vs compliance

The Opinion’s most important finding should concern every FinTech executive: 70% of competent authorities report high or rising ML/TF risks in the financial sector, with weak AML/CFT controls and poor governance being the main problems. The EBA clearly states that firms appear to focus on growth over compliance—a common issue in the FinTech space where getting to market quickly often conflicts with regulatory requirements.

This is especially relevant for EMIs and PSPs, where business models based on high transaction volumes and fast customer onboarding can create serious compliance gaps. The pressure to grow quickly while keeping operations lean has clearly gotten the attention of supervisors across Europe.

Technology: Solution or problem?

The Opinion shows a worrying contradiction in regulatory technology use. While RegTech promises better compliance capabilities, over half of serious compliance failures reported to the EBA’s database involved incorrect use of RegTech tools. This finding challenges the industry’s belief that technology solutions automatically improve compliance results.

For companies that have invested heavily in automated compliance systems, this should lead to serious questions about implementation quality, staff training, and ongoing oversight. Technology without proper human oversight and expertise appears to be creating new problems rather than solving existing ones.

Crypto assets: Still high-risk

The 2.5-fold increase in authorised crypto-asset service providers between 2022 and 2024 shows the sector’s rapid growth, but the EBA still considers crypto assets as high-risk. Many CASPs continue to lack effective AML/CFT systems, with some trying to avoid regulatory oversight completely.

For FinTech companies expanding into crypto services or partnering with CASPs, stronger due diligence and monitoring systems are essential. The ongoing MiCAR implementation adds another layer of complexity that needs careful handling.

AI and changing criminal methods

Perhaps most concerning is the EBA’s observation that criminals are increasingly using AI to automate laundering schemes, forge documents, and avoid detection. Financial institutions are struggling to keep up with these advanced threats, showing a critical competition between compliance technology and criminal innovation.

Practical recommendations for FinTech companies

Based on this Opinion, I recommend Fintech companies take the following steps:

1. Combine strong professionals with RegTech tools Don’t assume your automated systems work perfectly on their own. Review your RegTech tools regularly, focusing on configuration accuracy and alert quality. Most importantly, invest in skilled compliance personnel who can provide proper oversight of automated systems and understand their outputs. Technology and human expertise must work together—one cannot replace the other.

2. Balance growth and compliance properly Create clear governance frameworks that prevent compliance from being sacrificed for growth targets. Include compliance metrics as key performance indicators alongside traditional business metrics. Make compliance part of your business strategy, not an afterthought.

3. Prepare for AI threats Develop monitoring capabilities that can identify AI-generated fraud attempts and forged documents. Think about how criminals might exploit your specific business model using AI tools. This is an ongoing challenge that requires continuous attention.

Looking forward

The Opinion shows that 2025 is an important year for AML/CFT compliance in the EU. With AMLA taking over standalone AML/CFT powers from the EBA by year-end and new Guidelines coming into effect, FinTech companies face a period of significant regulatory change.

The message is clear: sustainable growth in the FinTech space requires mature compliance frameworks that can develop with both regulatory expectations and criminal innovation. Companies that continue to treat compliance as an afterthought are taking serious risks.

For EMIs and PSPs, the path forward involves treating compliance as a competitive advantage rather than just a regulatory burden. In an increasingly complex risk environment, strong AML/CFT capabilities will become a key differentiator for long-term business success.

For specific compliance guidance tailored to your business model, professional legal advice should be sought.

Would you like to discuss this further, get in touch Bauke through our contact page.

View All Blogs